Site icon Vermont Daily Chronicle

Ryan: Socrates and the failure of democracy

The Death of Socrates Jacques-Louis David (French, 1748–1825) 1787 Oil on canvas; 51 x 77 1/4 in. (129.5 x 196.2 cm) Accused by the Athenian government of denying the gods and corrupting the young through his teachings, Socrates (469–399 B.C.E.) was offered the choice of renouncing his beliefs or being sentenced to death by drinking hemlock. David shows him calmly discoursing on the immortality of the soul with his grief-stricken disciples. Painted in 1787 the picture, with its stoic theme, is perhaps David's most perfect Neoclassical statement. The printmaker and publisher John Boydell wrote to Sir Joshua Reynolds that it was "the greatest effort of art since the Sistine Chapel and the stanze of Raphael. . . . This work would have done honour to Athens at the time of Pericles." The subject is loosely based on Plato's "Phaedo," but in painting it David consulted a variety of sources, including Diderot's treatise on dramatic poetry of 1758 and works by the poet André Chenier. The pose of the figure at the foot of the bed was reportedly inspired by a passage in a novel by the English writer Richardson. Catharine Lorillard Wolfe Collection, Wolfe Fund, 1931 (31.45) ** The Metropolitan Museum of Art's permanent collection contains more than two million works of art from around the world. It opened its doors on February 20, 1872, housed in a building located at 681 Fifth Avenue in New York City. Under their guidance of John Taylor Johnston and George Palmer Putnam, the Met's holdings, initially consisting of a Roman stone sarcophagus and 174 mostly European paintings, quickly outgrew the available space. In 1873, occasioned by the Met's purchase of the Cesnola Collection of Cypriot antiquities, the museum decamped from Fifth Avenue and took up residence at the Douglas Mansion on West 14th Street. However, these new accommodations were temporary; after negotiations with the city of New York, the Met acquired land on the east side of Central Park, where it built its permanent home, a red-brick Gothic Revival stone "mausoleum" designed by American architects Calvert Vaux and Jacob Wrey Mold. As of 2006, the Met measures almost a quarter mile long and occupies more than two million square feet, more than 20 times the size of the original 1880 building. In 2007, the Metropolitan Museum of Art was ranked #17 on the AIA 150 America's Favorite Architecture list. The Metropolitan Museum of Art was designated a landmark by the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission in 1967. The interior was designated in 1977. National Historic Register #86003556

The Death of Socrates, 1787
Jacques-Louis David

by Kevin Ryan

I just read “Why Didn’t Socrates Like Democracy.” And as it turns out, I don’t like Democracy, either. 

Basically, Democracy means we can rule on anything we like, as long as 50% of people say we can.  That is about as dangerous a rule as I’ve ever heard.  If you can get 51% to agree that government can ban meat, it’s gone.  If you get 51% to say everyone leave their house with no pants on, it’s done.

Kevin Ryan

We’ve become increasingly controlling and controlled as a society. In Vermont, specifically, no more incandescent OR fluorescent light bulbs.  No more plastic bags or straws.  No more food in the trash.  No more menthol cigarettes, gasoline powered cars or oil-heated homes coming up next.  

These things are none of other people’s business.

But, hey, goes the wisdom…isn’t controlling these things a benefit to society?  Maybe. Who cares?  What is going to happen next, I assure you, is that enforcement agents will need to be hired to ensure that people comply with all these new bans and rules….and that will all cost money.  That money will come from you.  Eventually, the enforcement agents will find that YOU did something wrong…then, God help you.  This is how wars start and governments destabilize.

Instead, I like Republics.  In Republics, no matter how good an idea sounds to control your behavior, they’re not Nike. They can’t just do it. 

Wouldn’t it be better if people weren’t allowed to say untrue things anymore ? Yet before you know it, your neighbors will let La Policia know you’re using bad words….you know, like, “The King is a Fink.”  This is why we have a First Amendment.

The issue with being “Moderate” politically, is we say, “Well, I mean, a little control is okay, right? After all, we don’t want anyone using foul language or spreading misinformation, do we ?”  Next we’re trying to figure out if you get to stay in college if you say that men can’t have babies, or you need to be kicked out and go sweep floors for a living.

Standing in the middle of the road, figuring out what virtues you hold, after you figure out what’s going to be popular with the 51%, inspires nobody.  

I suppose you could persuade people to vote for the lesser of two evils once a year by doing so, but I will tell you now, no one will bother to get out of a chair and knock on doors for you, unless they believe that you really believe what you’re talking about, down in your soul.

That takes passion.  Passion is not found in the middle, the easy ground.

I like apple pie and puppies, just like you.  Tell someone you like apple pie and puppies, they might smile, grunt and go back to what they were doing.

Boring.

Now, try telling someone we need to end public schools.  One of two things is going to happen.  They will either walk up to you, shake your hand with a big grin and say, “Thank God someone else gets it!” or, their head will spin around and they will try to punch you in the face. 

The first guy will walk through a fire for you.  The second guy might, I say might, start to think about whether or not public schools are effective for his kids, and if they decide they aren’t so much, may eventually join you and your new-found friend.  

That’s how you win. Break people’s patterns of thinking, show them an alternative in a language they already understand and you can now change their way of thinking.

This is what political liberals, or despots do best.  Conserve energy…. smart idea, right ?  Well, you can do that by turning down your thermostat.  Good plan.  But why turn it down? In the morning, the toilet seat will be cold.  

Well, if we don’t conserve energy, the carbon will build up, heat up the Earth, the cities will flood, and children will die!  Why aren’t you turning down your thermostat, Citizen??  It’s time to put a digital monitor in your home to make sure you turn the thermostat down, and if you don’t, off to the gulag !  

Oh, and we have 51% support to do this.  I hate Democracy.

Socrates’ greatest pupil on our current state of affairs.
Exit mobile version