Site icon Vermont Daily Chronicle

Mercier: Federal bill could ban non-citizen voting in public elections

Let America Vote Act of 2024: “No person who is not a citizen shall be permitted or granted the right to vote in any taxpayer-funded election for public office held by or in the United States or any State.”

Louis Velazquez | Unsplash

By Jason Mercier, of the Mountain States Policy Center

The debate about open primaries may soon occur in the halls of Congress. A group of bipartisan lawmakers last month introduced the “Let America Vote Act of 2024” to require open primaries for state and federal elections across the country.

According to the bill: “It is the sense of Congress that the right of a citizen of the United States to vote in any taxpayer-funded election for public office shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on the grounds of political party affiliation or lack thereof.”

Here is what the sponsors said about why they introduced the national open primaries bill:

Sponsors of the “Let America Vote Act of 2024” described the bill’s features this way:

“The right of a U.S. citizen to vote in any taxpayer-funded election for public office shall not be denied or abridged on the grounds of political party affiliation or lack thereof.

No person who is not a citizen shall be permitted or granted the right to vote in any taxpayer-funded election for public office held by or in the United States or any State.”

Notably, this federal bill does not require the controversial use of Ranked Choice Voting (RCV). Open primaries and RCV are two very different things.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), “primaries can be categorized as closed, partially closed, partially open, open to unaffiliated voters, open or multi-party.” Here is how NCSL classifies each state’s primary system.

While there are many examples of states with open primaries, currently only Alaska and Maine use Ranked Choice Voting for statewide elections. Alaska voters narrowly adopted RCV in 2020 by 50.55%, but its use has been so controversial that Alaskans this fall will have the opportunity to repeal it with the certification of a new ballot measure.

Both Washington’s Secretary of State Steve Hobbs and Montana’s Secretary of State Christi Jacobsen have spoken out against ranked choice voting, with Hobbs saying “ranked-choice voting adds a layer of complexity to voting that threatens to disenfranchise people who aren’t experts at the process.”

As expressed by the sponsors of the “Let America Vote Act of 2024,” it is important to remember that taxpayer-funded elections don’t belong to private political groups. Moving our election systems to a clean open primary is a debate worth having. Adopting open primaries, however, should not be limited to a take-it-or-leave-it proposition tied to the controversy of Ranked Choice Voting.

Jason Mercier is Vice President and Director of Research of Mountain States Policy Center, an independent research organization based in Idaho, Montana, Eastern Washington and Wyoming. Online at mountainstatespolicy.org.

Exit mobile version