Site icon Vermont Daily Chronicle

MacDonald: Hey, Burlington: Prostitution was “legal” in Rhode Island for 29 years – it did not go well

by Steve MacDonald, for Granite Grok

People who profit from prostitution are typically its boosters. They call it sex work, describe it as a right, and dress it up as a noble calling. That sounds great, but what legalized sex work actually looks like is slavery, trafficking, and sexual assault.

And we don’t have to look far to see the truth. 

From 1980 to 2009, prostitution in Rhode Island was decriminalized. Prostitution was not prohibited or regulated by law if it was performed indoors. The lack of laws or regulations created a unique and permissive legal, economic, and cultural environment for the growth of sex businesses. Although a few counties in Nevada have legalized prostitution, no other state or county has decriminalized prostitution in recent decades. During the twenty-nine-year period from 1980 to 2009, sexual exploitation and violence against women and girls were integrated into the economic development of Rhode IslandÕs urban areas. 

It might take you an hour to read the research paper, but it’s worth the time if the topic is of interest (a summary can be found here), and it should be. Last year the people of Burlington voted to “bar the city council from regulating sex work.” It’s not legal, but they are prohibited from enforcing any laws or imposing any regulatory or public health controls.

Steve MacDonald

Hands off is how I read it, and that’s very bad news for girls and women, which the Rhode Island study bears out.

From the summary.

 The Burlington law does not prohibit State or Federal investigations, arrests, or prosecutions, so it is different from the RI issue, which the state legislature corrected in 2009 after nearly three decades of crime, human trafficking, sexual assault, and abuse.

In a separate Study, another female researcher investigated Legalized Prostitution in New Zealand, the Netherlands, and elsewhere with similar results. Women are trafficked, poorly housed and treated, and moved around from brotherly to brothel. But the second study looks into the politics as well as the groups that advocate for “sex workers.”

The names of organizations advocating legalized prostitution are another source of confusion. Sex industry apologists calculatedly appropriate the titles of human rights or public health organizations. Although their Human Trafficking names are similar, the Global Alliance Against Trafficking in Women (GAATW) promotes prostitution as sex work, while the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women (CATW) works for the abolition of prostitution and other forms of discrimination against women. Other organizations that accept or promote prostitution as a reasonable job for poor women include the Dutch Foundation for Women (STV); Coordination for Action Research on AIDS and Mobility (CARAM/Cambodia); European Network for HIV/STD Prevention in Europe (EUROPAP); Transnational AIDS/STD Prevention among Migrant Prostitutes (TAMPEP; Netherlands, Italy, Ger-many, and Austria); CARE International; North American TaskForce on Prostitution; Anti-Slavery International; Human Rights Watch; Amnesty International (USA); Amnesty for Women, Hamburg; Rights of Entertainers in Asia to Combat Human Oppression and Unjust Treatment, Hong Kong (REACH OUT); Bangladesh Women’s Health Coalition; Medecins sans Frontieres; From Our Streets with Dignity (FROST’D), NewYork; Coalition Against Slavery and Trafficking (CAST), Los Angeles; Prostitution Alternatives Counseling and Education (PACE), Vancouver, Canada; Nueva Era en Salud, Panama.

United Nations organizations such as the WHO, UN/AIDS, and the International Labor Organization (ILO) have also supported the legalization of prostitution and have generally regarded prostitution as work (Lim,1998; South African Press Association, 2001).In 2001, Gilles Poumerol, WHO’s Southeast Asian advisor on sexually transmitted infections, promoted the decriminalization of prostitution in Asia (Deutsche Press-Agentur, 2001). Unfortunately, names cannot be trusted to tell the whole story.

These groups all have a vested interest in the byproduct of sex work, which makes them – for lack of a better term, pimps. In some cases the pimp is the state. 

Prostitution has been proposed as a development policy for newly industrializing and developing countries. Often, those promoting prostitution are sex industry businessmen and government officials. Sex businesses such as escort prostitution, mas-sage brothels, strip clubs, phone sex businesses, and Internet prostitution have been described by Lim (1998)as the sex sector of a state’s economy. In some countries, profits from the sex sector are included in estimates of its economic activity.

For example, in the Netherlands, the sex industry constitutes 5% of the GDP (Daley, 2001). Women in Dutch prostitution tell us that although legalization of prostitution was promoted as a way to improve their lives, they view it primarily as a way for the State to tax their earnings (Schippers, 2002). Often they do not think that their health has benefited or that they are offered more protection under legalized or decriminalized prostitution. 

In almost every case where prostitution was legalized as sex work, the girls were beaten, abused, raped, or otherwise harmed, while crime increased in the neighborhoods where sex work was practiced.

I’ve not looked, and perhaps it is too soon, but the sanctuary city of Burlington, in the sanctuary State of Vermont, is likely home to an increasing number of trafficked immigrant girls or will be. Organized crime and less organized gangs will be drawn to the income opportunities of unregulated sex work, and the women -some of who will live like slaves – will pay the price for what a bunch of dim-witted progressives thought was a liberty or privacy issue.

Steve MacDonald is a long-time New Hampshire resident, blogger, and a member of the Board of directors of The 603 Alliance. He is the Managing Editor and co-owner of GraniteGrok.com, a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, and a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

Exit mobile version