Site icon Vermont Daily Chronicle

House overrides veto of Brat 16-year-old voter bill

VT House GOP Caucus Decries Override of Gov. Scott’s Veto of Brattleboro Charter Change

In a statement issued today, the Vermont House Republican Caucus decried the Vermont House of Representatives’ override of Governor Phil Scott’s veto of H.361, an act relating to approval of amendments to the charter of the Town of Brattleboro:

“Vermont Democrat lawmakers have sent a series of mixed signals when it comes to their trust in young Vermonters,” said House Minority Leader Pattie McCoy (R-Poultney). “As it pertains to certain local elections, Democrats want 16-year-olds to be able to vote. But, according to the framework Democrats have structured, those same 16-year-olds would have to wait two years before they could play the lottery or join the military; 6 years before they could purchase alcohol or tobacco; and 7 years before they could be considered an adult for criminal proceedings. There is no consistency. Rather, there exists a patchwork of unclear and confusing contradictions.”

“In fact, when Vermont Democrats recently worked to raise the age of “youthful offenders” through age 22, they cited research indicating that these younger individuals take more risks, are more prone to peer pressure, and are less future oriented. Apparently, Vermont Democrats only feel young voters are mature enough to make informed decisions when it might be politically expedient.”

“Governor Scott’s veto of this legislation that House Democrats have now rejected was simple and sensible: the Legislature should be consistent on the age of adulthood. This should apply not only for different types of activities, but for all elections as well. Opening the door to early voting in certain elections in specific municipalities only worsens the Legislature’s “cafeteria” approach to the concept of adulthood, where Democrats pick and choose when the age of majority is reached.”

“Vermont House Republicans are disappointed in the House’s decision to override Governor Scott’s veto of H.361, and hope the Senate will give the issue more deliberate consideration.”

Exit mobile version