Covid-19

G20 signs declaration for international vaccine passport

U.S. signs April 2021 White House promise to not require vax passports

by Dr. Joseph Mercola

The G20, a group of 19 nations — including the U.S. — plus the European Union, recently held their annual business meeting (B20) in Bali, Indonesia, where they declared that a digital vaccine passport, standardized by the World Health Organization, will be part of international pandemic prevention and response moving forward.

The rule for standardized international vaccine passports will be introduced as a revision to the international health regulations during the next World Health Assembly in Geneva.


The G20 recommendations also include the creation of guidelines for a globally coordinated response to crises, “enhanced by a technology-enabled ‘always-on’ global health infrastructure,” and a mutual recognition of COVID-19 vaccines made by G20 members.


President Biden signed the declaration despite the promises made by his White House COVID-19 Response Team leader, Jeff Zients, who in April 2021 stated, “Let me be clear that the government is not now, nor will we be supporting a system that requires Americans to carry a [vaccination] credential.” Read more

Dr. Mercola is an osteopathic physician and a best-selling author, with a total of 15 books written so far. His most recent book, “The Truth About COVID-19,” is a national bestseller on Amazon, Wall Street Journal, USA Today and Publishers Weekly.

Categories: Covid-19

13 replies »

  1. Initiating a vaccine passport is criminal on many levels and violates basic human rights. Requiring such a passport is one step of many western nations have been implementing to limit freedom and liberty. Proof of vaccination for travel is not in the service of public health. It is in the service of those who want power and control over a population which they think is largely useless and incapable of making informed choices. When one complies with such things one is essentially trading liberty for security and are conflating freedom to travel with being granted the privilege to travel based on giving up the freedom for bodily autonomy.

    • It’s not that a vaccine passport is criminal. But a coerced passport, based on an experimental vaccine, certainly is.

      The Nuremberg Code (1947): Permissible Medical Experiments

      “1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”

      Is ‘the code’ enforceable?
      “The Nuremberg Code is a foundational document in the ethics of medical research and human experimentation; the principle its authors espoused in 1946 have provided the framework for modern codes that address the same issues and have received little challenge and only slight modification in decades since.”

      On the other hand, codes of ethical behavior are only as enforceable as those assigned to administer them are inclined to act. Is it not curious then, that the Chief of the Bio-Ethics Department at the National Institutes of Health is Christine Grady? … none other than the wife of Dr. Anthony Fauci.

      • Enforcing any vaccine is criminal.

        I agree.

        However, my agreement with you should not be construed to mean I would refuse ‘any vaccine’. Only that the decision is mine and no one else’s.

      • I agree that the decision should definitely be the person taking the vaccines and no one else’s.

        However at this point with what I’ve learned now I’ll never take another one. In fact what they did was wake me up to the fact that if your vaccine works I shouldn’t have to worry about it and neither should you and the only reason for anything different is that the vaccine doesn’t work to begin with. In fact in some cases there’s a real possibility that it’s the cause to begin with.

      • Re: However, at this point with what I’ve learned now I’ll never take another one.

        Never take any vaccine? The important point is that the choice is yours, and no one else’s.

        Caution: I was confronted with a decision to take a vaccine or not just before the Covid pandemic occurred. It was a risk-reward issue.

        Covid has a mortality rate of less than 1% … not counting the use of alternative treatments (Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, etc., that further lower the risk). For children, the Covid mortality rate in Vermont is 0%. The risk/reward ratio for taking the Covid vaccine is a no-brainer.

        But I came in contact with a rabid racoon. For comparison, the mortality rate when contracting rabies is greater than 99%. The risk/reward ratio of taking the rabies vaccine was also a no-brainer.

        Never say never. Always weigh the risks.

  2. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/11/16/g20-bali-leaders-declaration/

    All you have to do is read the end of number 23.

    There are many other interesting things in this particular declaration.

    While you’re at it check out these two (especially if you want to know what’s really going on):

    -https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/03/09/executive-order-on-ensuring-responsible-development-of-digital-assets/

    -https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/09/12/executive-order-on-advancing-biotechnology-and-biomanufacturing-innovation-for-a-sustainable-safe-and-secure-american-bioeconomy/

    Put the three together and use the wonderful mind God gave you.

  3. Tens of millions of US citizens will be lined up, clamoring to obtain these “passports”, the soon to be mandatory digital identity and pay gladly with state-run cyber currency.
    They will happily accept the new ‘rules’ thinking it provides safety.
    They will happily accept whatever mandated injection of chemicals is demanded.
    They are happily accepting a new world order.
    Have we not seen, just in the last 3 years enough evidence of the totalitarian aims of current government leadership?
    Has not Trudeau’s fascist policies of late, CCP Chinese totalitarian edicts and actions
    given us forewarning of demands coming from our own corrupt politicians? Has anyone paid attention to the increasing requirement for blind obedience to governments- and penalties including death to those that don’t comply, worldwide?
    I fear not.
    When the truth becomes clear, do not ask how we knew. Ask yourself why you did not.

  4. Define ‘declaration’…

    As in ‘mandate’…

    Is it law, a requirement, or a ‘suggestion’ as Scott and Fauci squiggled out of after 2 years of ‘mandated’ vaccines and mask wearing…vigilanct minds want to know…what dictionary/legalize are they using?

Leave a Reply