Legislation

Housing challenge facing Legislature: $300K home now costs $400K

Workforce development, statewide mask mandate, taxes also discussed in first Chamber report of the 2022 session

by Austin Davis, Lake Champlain Chamber

In the first week of the legislative session, legislators laid out priorities for the session and the Governor addressed the legislature in his biennial State of the State address to lay out his priorities. All of this is set to a backdrop of higher than expected tax revenues, a relatively good economic outlook, and still a great deal of federal funds available.  

Items raised this week to watch develop over the next few weeks: 

  • Tax Cut? Tax Rebate? Tax Credits? Either way, state leaders are looking to give around $50 million in tax relief to Vermonters. Governor Scott hinted at tax cuts and his Commissioner of Taxes presented his hope of using half of $90 million in surplus to provide property tax relief to represent an average tax rate decrease of 9%, potentially as a rebate. The Speaker responded that if there are tax cuts, they’ll be focussed on those with kids. In Senate Finance and House Ways and Means, both chairs discussed creating a state equivalent of the federal Child Tax Credit, which is in limbo due to President Biden’s Build Back Better legislation not advancing. The House Ways and Means Committee already took up H.510, which would create a $1,200 fully refundable tax credit at a cost of about $59 million
  • Statewide Mask Mandate: Since the passage of Act 1 during an emergency session less than two months ago only 22.8% of Vermonters live in a town that has a full mask mandate. An additional 8% live in towns in which there is a mask mandate for municipal buildings. Democratic party legislative leadership feels that a statewide mandate is necessary and expressed their desire to pass such legislation, even with the threat of the Governor’s veto. A bill to do just that was introduced in the House this week. 
  • Budget Adjustment Act(BAA): This bill is going to move a little faster than typical while also likely being larger than typical to accommodate acute needs. In the State of the State, Governor Scott proposed using $200 million for housing, workforce support, and COVID-related healthcare. Each of the below issues has elements within the proposed BAA. 
  • Workforce: The Governor’s address was heavy on talk of workforce issues and there is general consensus throughout the State House (be it virtual) that this is the greatest challenge our economy faces, with housing and childcare issues directly feeding the broader workforce issue. Outside of the housing initiatives, the Governor has proposed using $45 million from property tax surplus to support Career Technical Education. Additionally, in his address, he foreshadowed a coming proposal to increase funding for childcare financial assistance. 
  • Housing: The Governor’s proposed BAA includes $80 million for housing programs. The House General Committee heard from the Administration about the efforts to reach “missing middle” housing. Homebuyers between 80% – 140% of AMI could be eligible for a price “buy down under a $5 million suggested pilot program. The program is heavily focussed on construction and development, or the front end, where previous efforts have been more about the rent or mortgage, the back end. This reflects the reality that a roughly $300,000 home now can cost almost more than $400,000 to build in our state. In the Senate, this week the failed bills S.79 (rental registry and Vermont Housing Improvement Program) and S.101 (promoting housing choice and opportunity in smart growth areas) were discussed with the implications that the Senate Economic Committee does not intend to be sidelined by the Natural Resource Committee in the face of our current housing crisis. 
  • Economic Development bill: The Senate is interested in an omnibus economic development bill which will involve revisiting much of the economic development from the last session such as worker relocation, capital investment grants, bridge grants, and funds for brownfield mitigation. In addition to this, there is renewed interest in incentives for film production in Vermont. 
  • Pensions: The Speaker made a point that conspicuously absent from the Governor’s address was a mention of pension reform. It is worth noting that the legislative taskforce working on this has not yet delivered their final report and one legislative chair noted this week that it is not worth speculating until that report is signed. At the end of the last legislative session, the Senate put the cost of teachers Other Post-Employment Benefit (OPEB) into the education fund and budgeted $13.8 million for it, which the house rejected, so that money is sitting in reserve.
  • Redistricting: The House Committee on Government Operations wasted no time this week moving forward on the process of reapportioning legislative districts that happens every 10-years following the census. In a not all too surprising move, the Committee decided to not take the recommendation of the Legislative Reapportionment Board that would make single-member districts for House members. 
  • Education Funding: The Per Pupil Weighting Taskforce Report can be a rather complicated and dizzying issue that will undoubtedly have high-stake ripple effects across the education system in Vermont, as changing any one variable can make a massive financial change in a school district’s funding. Committees of jurisdiction got an initial walkthrough from members of the taskforce this week of their recommendations which would change the way in which the number of students in poverty is calculated, remove English language learning from the weighting factor in favor of categorical aide, as well as a possibly overly ambitious move of education funding from homestead property tax to income tax. While there is a lot to unpack, pay close attention and be vigilant for a few things; potential increases to the cost of education across the board and dramatic redistributions of funding between schools. The Agency of Education published a calculator to evaluate the impact on your town. Education funding will likely be a point of contention this year between this proposal, available surplus allocation, changes in the common level of appraisal (CLA) brought on in part by the pandemic, and other factors such as uncertainty of continued revenue growth in sales tax. 
  • Climate Change: The Senate Committee on Natural Resources heard from the Agency of Natural Resources about the waning feasibility of reaching the legally binding targets of the Global Warming Solutions Act. The Committee will pick up the work of the last session to reach the Chair’s goal of weatherizing 100,000 homes by 2030 which will mostly need to take the form of a workforce bill. Other priorities seem to include increasing the state’s Renewable Energy Standard to 100% by 2030, creating a Clean Heat Standard (will start in the House), and getting Act 250 reform unstuck. 
  • Act 250: In his state of the state, the Governor called for reform on Act 250 to respond to housing demand and make the most of federal dollars. The House Natural Resources Committee walked through a draft bill from the Chair of the Committee to split the appeals process. Two bills on the subject were also introduced by their Senate counterparts.
  • Other Conversations and Items of Interest:
    • The Chair of Senate Economic noted that he didn’t want to lose progress on the $15/hour minimum wage campaign of yesteryear and discussed achieving that number and then linking it to CPI again despite employers paying that, or often more than that, right now. Among other items, the Senate Committee on Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs discussed was the desire for paid family and medical leave. 
    • The Senate Finance Committee is expecting to take up the corporate tax modernization bill that came to them late last session soon and possibly will not need to find additional revenue given the latest modeling, spelling good news for the battle against the internet service (cloud) tax
    • A bill from the Chair of Ways and Means would eliminate local options sales tax and create a uniform local share of sales and use tax revenue
    • S.159 was introduced which would make sole-proprietors and independent contractors eligible for unemployment insurance. 
    • S.172, authorizing alternative procedures for 2022 annual municipal meetings in response to COVID-19, was quickly passed through the Senate and sent to the House in an effort to provide a longer runway for municipalities to plan for town meeting day given the spike in omicron cases. 
    • The Health Care Advocate is asking the legislature to ban stop-loss insurance. Businesses currently can purchase stop-loss insurance so they can self-insure their employees’ health care while limiting their exposure if an employee has a particularly high claim.

9 replies »

  1. Yes, I know – I paid over $400,000 for a (at best) $300,000 home last year & hold a hefty mortgage. So the leftist legislator’s answers? Bring in MORE illegals and more “refugees” to a place that even tens of thousands of long-term & native Vermonters cannot afford to live. Makes THEM feel good as they live comfortably in towns like Shelburne and Charlotte while they “represent” Burlington & Winooski.

    Say “hi” to George Soros for us all, traitors!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. Every issue listed above is directly attributable to past government attempts to “fix” a problem, whether a problem existed or not.
    The Vermont legislature in it’s zeal to embrace socialism created this mess. Think about that in the weeks leading up to November 8th 2022.

  3. The state should obviously mandate N-95 masks for the entire population, and provide them as well, with weekly replacements. It’s only about 2 million masks a month. Not a problem. Because the cloth masks are no good against Omicron, right? We will also need a massive incinerator to burn all the contaminated masks as well as a bio-hazard collection service to go door-to-door to remove the soiled masks from homes. A “mask enforcement” squad will also have to be set up to monitor and enforce the mask wearing, and to make sure that the masks are worn as tight as possible, otherwise they won’t work. The masks will have to be numbered and checked against the official mask database to prevent the wearing of old masks or the counterfeiting of masks.

    We will also have to write laws making the non-wearing of a fresh N-95 mask a criminal offense, punishable by massive fines and incarceration in a prison camp for the duration of the pandemic, or whenever there is a respiratory virus in the community. We will also have to build more facilities for juvenile offenders, and we will have to hire teachers to work at these facilities. We will also have to enshrine these laws into the state constitution, so that future lawmakers can’t overturn the mask rules. Alternatively, the state should ban all elections, and revert back to feudalism until Science has cured all disease and removed the threat of death from society, or at least for Democrats. These new “Life Enhancement Programs” will necessitate the building of a huge wall around the state to prevent the diseased virus-spewers from New York and New Hampshire getting in and spreading the virus and to keep Vermonters safe from all disease. Yeah, that’s the ticket.

  4. How about using it to eliminate school taxes and income taxes for people over 65. They have paid their way in life, have no kids in school and live on a fixed income.

    • A gentleman ran last year for the VT legislature in Colchester with one of his goals to attempt just that again. I sent out emails & posted his intentions on FPF for all this in the district to realize.

      After the votes (fraudulent & legit alike) the dimocrat drones elected the same radical leftist back into office DESPITE the fact that they’ll all be paying more for the “privilege” of having her fight to ensure illegals vote, more low income dumps be built, drug pushers & gangsta’s be provided second and eventually eighth chances, that prostitution be made legal in order to “empower” women (lol) etc. etc.

      Their minds and sometimes their souls are long lost.

  5. “The Speaker responded that if there are tax cuts, they’ll be focused on those with kids.” No doubt because those of us without kids are just rollin in the dough at least partially because we are allowed to help give those with kids financial help educating them. Right ?

  6. When gov’t officials propose “forgiving” student loans, dont be surprised if other people with voluntary debts come along with their hand out. Why not “forgive” all home mortgages?
    After all, housing is a “human right”…

Leave a Reply