By Guy Page
October 6, 2020 – Republicans in Grand Isle County bought a full page ad in the September 23-29 issue of The Islander, a local community newspaper, accusing local representative and House Speaker Mitzi Johnson of preparing the way for a climate tax – despite a petition in opposition signed by 860 constituents.
The ad appears on page 9 and is entitled “The Global Warming Solutions Act. – GWSA”. Paid for by the Grand Isle County / West Milton Republicans, it urges voters to support GOP challengers Leland Morgan (an incumbent) and Mike Morgan, who are running against Democrat incumbent Johnson and challenger Andy Julow.
The ad notes:
- Speaker Johnson led the effort to override Gov. Phil Scott’s veto of H688, the Global Warming Solutions Act
- The GWSA establishes and requires taxpayers to pay per diem costs for an unelected, 23-person Climate Council and subcommittees to set and implement carbon-reducing policies without further legislation.
- 860 Grand Isle residents signed a petition opposing a carbon tax.
- Furthermore, the ad claims that the Climate Council will recommend carbon pricing.
“Make no mistake,” the ad continues, “the first recommendation by the 23-member council will be to implement a carbon tax (carbon pricing); disguised as a fee or surcharge because only the Legislature can raise taxes.”
“Ms. Jenn Wood wrote in The Islander last week that Maine, New York, Massachusetts and Connecticut have passed similar laws to the GWSA,” the ad says. It notes that all of these states are pursuing carbon pricing. “Don’t pretend a carbon tax will not be a top recommendation by the Council, because it will! Rep. Mitzi Johnson has found a way to ignore 860 of her constituents and implement a carbon tax without it being called one.”
“She must think we are ignorant,” the ad says. “Let’s stop this back-door political strategizing, and allowing special interest groups to write state law filled with regulations and mandates and let’s vote for change. We need Common Sense in Montpelier.”
During discussion of Vermont’s membership in the multi-state carbon pricing initiative, the Transportation Climate Initiative, there was uncertainty about whether a TCI assessment of 5-18 cents at the gas pump would require legislative approval. Both legislative and executive leaders said that a Vermont-based tax or fee would require legislative approval. However, it was also suggested that other states could unilaterally impose a fee on Vermont consumers by assessing “carbon pollution costs” on regional wholesale fuel dealers of gasoline and on-road diesel fuel.
At his press conference today, Gov. Scott would not comment specifically on the Climate Council imposing carbon pricing, but did say it will have wide, almost unlimited latitude. “That’s why I vetoed it, from a constitutional standpoint,” he said. “A 23-person council that is unaccountable in some respects, they could impose almost anything, from our perspective. I think they have a lot of latitude. The legislature abdicated their power and gave it to this council. They could do almost anything.”
This morning, reporter reached out to Speaker Johnson for comment. An email was received this afternoon, after the initial post and email was published. The following is Speaker Johnson’s response, printed verbatim:
Planning, strategy, and accountability:
This Global Warming Solutions Act is about building reliance and preventing economic disruption due to weather change that is already happening. The change is already visible to key rural sectors: all agricultural sectors, ski industry and the winter tourism that depends on winter conditions, and water temperature and algae bloom which affects our ecology as well as our summer tourism.
The bill does not create a carbon tax. The bill does not ban any activities. The council cannot raise taxes, spend money on its own, or pass legislation. Those constitutional powers remain with the legislature. There’s no way around that. Nor should there be.
Job creation and keeping money in Vermont:
This is an opportunity to create jobs in weatherization, building trades, sustainable energy and critical solutions. It means we keep more dollars in state helping local businesses. Reducing emissions also means Vermonters save money on heating and transportation costs.
The Climate Council:
It’s a diverse group representing climate scientists, rural communities, fuel industry, small businesses, environmental groups, transportation, farmers and foresters, manufacturers, youth, low-income Vermonters, towns, and others. Led by the Governor’s cabinet, they will create a plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions per the Paris Climate Accord, a long-time statutory goal shared by 25 states. At some point the U.S. will rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement. This makes sure that Vermont isn’t left behind.
It narrows, not expands, a right to sue:
Citizens and groups can already sue the state. This bill removes the ability to sue for damages. It allows people to hold their government accountable in the courts. And there is no basis for a lawsuit if the state holds to the basic standards.
“We believe maintaining this commitment and the U.S. leadership on climate change is the right action for the protection of our children, grandchildren and future generations.” remarked Gov Scott when the U.S. parted ways with 187 countries and pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord. But he has not taken action. Vermont is the only regional state with increasing emissions. We must act. We need leaders who understand climate science, realize the local impact of global warming, and are committed to implementing solutions that work for our communities and for our future.
GRAPHIC: Excerpt of GOP ad in 9/23 The Islander.
“With the important nature of the task at hand, I am hoping to work with the Committee on Committees to appoint the council members as quickly as possible while searching for the most qualified individuals for these positions. With that in mind, if you are interested, please send your information to Deb.email@example.com by 5 PM on Thursday Oct. 8th in order that we may review your application.”
“With this bill, the Legislature has created more regulatory uncertainty, not less. Our outdoor recreation economy, and the groups that help to maintain and preserve these networks, need a regulatory framework that is responsible, respectful and stable,” wrote Governor Scott in his letter to the Legislature. “Nothing in this bill modernizes or improves the Act 250 process – something that is widely agreed to be necessary after fifty years of existence,” the Governor added.
The Scott Milne for Lieutenant Governor campaign today released a transcript of an exchange yesterday between WPTZ reporter Stewart Ledbetter and Democrat Lieutenant Gov. Candidate Molly Gray in which she refuses to answer directly his question about working on campaign activities while on the job at the Vermont Attorney General’s office.
“Act 35 permits any minor, without age restraints, the ability to give consent to receive any legally authorized outpatient treatment from a mental health professional without parent or legal guardian consent. Act 35 assumes all minors possess the mental capacity to give consent. Act 35 assumes all adults are safe.” – Carol Kauffman, Vergennes
- Burlington businesses offer ‘safety escorts’
- Water Cooler: State colleges mandate vax / Just back from P-town? Get tested / Cops apologize for Essex arrest / UVM applications up / Teen pleads innocent to attempted murder
- Levine leaning toward masking students this fall
- Revenue surplus adds $52 million to pension fund
- CRT/Equity Townhall 7/30 in Brattleboro
ZUCKERMAN WOULD HAVE ENFORCED MASK BAN SOONER: “Zuckerman sold his soul to Big Pharma. It’s pretty sad.”
Comment on VTWatercooler news by going to www.vtwatercooler.com:
I would like the health commissioner to show us the data that masks have helped curb cases. (And no, he…
The businesses of the City of Sodom and Gomorrah trying to survive the Marxist takeover.
Where are our “elected officials” who are concerned about the Constitution and America? Why are they not standing up and…
It is heartbreaking to see little 3 and 4 year olds in school, especially those struggling with speech and learning…
Many might vote for fe;lker. That’s why he’s being silenced.