Will Scott require mandatory COVID-19 vaccination?

No answer yet but he wants immunization registry “improvements”

by Guy Page

August 24, 2020 – Virginia State Health Commissioner Dr. Norman Oliver’s decision to require Covid-19 vaccinations for state residents once a vaccine is available has many Vermonters wondering: will the State of Vermont require mandatory vaccinations, too?

To date neither Gov. Phil Scott nor Health Commissioner Mark Levine have said much about the details of implementing Covid-19 vaccination in Vermont. However, both often point to a vaccine as the likeliest way to end the pandemic and the State of Emergency. And both men are on record as supporting mandatory vaccination for other diseases.

Dr. Oliver reportedly told News 8 TV that as long as he is health commissioner, he will mandate the vaccine. Virginia state law allows mandatory immunization during a pandemic. “It is killing people now, we don’t have a treatment for it and if we develop a vaccine that can prevent it from spreading in the community we will save hundreds and hundreds of lives,” Oliver reportedly said.

At Gov. Scott’s press conference tomorrow, Vermont Daily intends to ask both him and Commissioner Levine if they would mandate Covid-19 vaccination, and if exceptions for religion, personal philosophy or any other reason would be permitted. Levine is on record for closing the religious exemption for mandatory childhood vaccination for measles. Like Oliver, Levine points to the deadly consequences of not fully vaccinating the U.S. population. Before Covid-19 struck, the Vermont Legislature also was considering closing the religious exemption (H238, other bills).

Levine wants to know more about the vaccine before making usage recommendations, a VT Dept. of Health spokesperson Ben Truman said today. “At this stage, Commissioner Levine is focused on the progress of potential vaccines and any subsequent approval by the FDA,” Truman told Vermont Daily today. “Data on Covid-19 vaccines that will be FDA-approved and recommended by the CDC are not yet available. Priority groups for distribution (e.g. high risk) also have not yet been defined. The pending data and related information will be essential to informing state recommendations.”

One might expect the chief public health officer to take a hard line for mandatory vaccination. Our governor also is showing his zeal for vaccination in the Covid-19 era. Thursday, August 20, in a proclamation for August as Immunization Awareness Month, Scott said “Vermont is preparing for the arrival of a Covid-19 vaccine(s),” and, “Vermont evaluates its Immunization Information System, also known as an immunization registry, to determine if any necessary improvements are needed.”

An immunization registry is clearly a way to track who has been immunized. Is one of those “necessary improvements” tracking those Vermonters who have not been immunized? And if so, what will the State of Vermont do with that information? Will non-compliant Vermonters be told to get a shot or lose their jobs? Will unvaccinated children be allowed in school? Such a compulsory system already is in place at the university level. According to Covid-19 “Green and Gold” promise guidelines adopted for the fall semester at UVM, all students must get season flu shots. Failure to comply can result in expulsion without reimbursement of tuition.

If the State of Vermont requires Covid-19 vaccinations “or else,” officials may find Vermonters in opposition. An August Gallup poll shows a third of Americans say they won’t take the Covid-19 vaccine. Sure, it’s early yet and Vermonters may be more amenable to Covid-19 measures than other parts of the country. But still – “choice” has a strong resonance in Vermont. So does the medical concept of informed consent – even Commissioner Levine has spoken out strongly in favor of the concept, said Jennifer Stella, a leader in Health Choice Vermont.

Stella has a Bachelors of Science in microbiology and worked for over a decade in infectious disease diagnostics. She describes Health Choice Vermont as a “nonpartisan, volunteer citizen advocacy group which is pro-medical consent, pro-consumer information and pro-health.”

Noting the Virginia compulsory immunization decision, Stella said “I would not be surprised if Gov. Scott and particularly Dr. Levine are being pressured to do something similar here in Vermont. The main problem is they do not have the public support. Anywhere. So how would they roll it out?”

The level of support is difficult to gauge. During the campaign for the Democratic nomination for governor, challenger Rebecca Holcombe repeatedly challenged frontrunner David Zuckerman for (she said) opposing mandatory vaccinations (for measles, etc., not Covid-19). He denied the charge but the issue simmered throughout the campaign. Conflict between Vermonters eager to do whatever it takes to end the State of Emergency and other Vermonters opposed to mandatory Covid-19 vaccination could reach a rolling boil, up to and past the November 3 election.


Vermont is among the 13 states to directly fund abortion providers with taxpayer dollars, according to a new interactive map of the U.S. prepared by the Family Research Council.

Thirteen states have taken steps to directly fund abortions and abortion providers with taxpayer dollars: California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington,” according to an August 18 FRC press release. Twenty-three states have defunded (or attempted to defund) abortions with taxpayer dollars. (Some efforts have been stalled or stopped by the courts.)


Welch votes for Post Office bailout – Lou Varricchio of the Vermont Eagle reports that what Rep. Peter Welch claims is an election-saving vote is really just another federal bailout of a chronic Big Spender. See his recent story, “Partisan politics over Post Office hemorrhaging.”